Legal Opinion

Falkosky v. Allstate Insurance Company

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 20, 1993No. 23976PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI

2Per curiam

Petitioners seek a writ of certiorari to review the Court of Appeals’ decision in Falkosky v. Allstate Insurance Company, — S.C. —, 429 S.E. (2d) 194 (Ct. App. 1993). We grant the writ as to Question I, deny the writ as to Question II, dispense with further briefing and affirm as modified.

This case involves the construction of an exclusion in a homeowner’s insurance policy. In reaching its conclusion that the exclusion prevents coverage in this case, the Court of Appeals relied on the standard established in McPherson v. Michigan Mutual Ins. Co., — S.C. —, 426 S.E. (2d)…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McPherson Ex Rel. McPherson v. Michigan Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  2. Falkosky v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993

4Cited by11 opinions

  1. B.L.G. Enterprises, Inc. v. First Financial InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  2. USAA Property & Casualty Insurance v. Clegg Ex Rel. Estate of CleggSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
  3. Allstate Insurance v. DrumhellerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
  4. MGC Management of Charleston, Inc. v. Kinghorn Insurance AgencyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
  5. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API