Legal Opinion
Stinson v. Daniel
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided March 10, 1967PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chattin
Fred Daniel, Administrator of the Estate of his son, James Daniel, brought this suit for the death of his son who was killed in a collision between a motorcycle operated by him and an automobile operated by defendant, Robert E. Stinson.
The collision occurrred at the intersection of Highway 92, George Street, and U. S. Highway 11-E in Jefferson City on November 16, 1963, at approximately nine P.M. U.S. Highway 11-E is a four-lane highway running east and west with the lanes being divided by a twenty-foot median. George Street, or Highway 92, is a two-lane highway running- north and south. The…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Osborn v. City of NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1945
- Mitchell v. KetnerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1964
- Shell Oil Company v. BlanksCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1959
- Fairbanks, Morse & Co. v. GambillTennessee Supreme Court · 1919
- Nichols v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1937
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Benton v. SnyderTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
- Ellithorpe v. Ford Motor CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1973
- McLaughlin v. Rova Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
- Benson v. H.G. Hill Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1985
- James D. Arms v. State Farm Fire & Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.