Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Girard Will Case

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 12, 1956No. Appeals, Nos. 167, 168, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 202 and 203Published

1Concurrence

Concurring Opinion by

Mr. Justice Bell:

Stephen Girard left (most of) his enormous estate to establish a perpetual orphan home and college for “poor white male orphans”. I fully agree with everything that Chief Justice Stern has said in his exceptionally able opinion. However, since appellants, in order to convert a private charitable orphanage establishment into a publicly owned and publicly sustained public school, i.e., “a segregation case”, have distorted the plain language and the clear meaning of Girard’s will, as well as the principles and legal effect of numerous authorities, I deem it…

2Cases cited71 opinions

  1. Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Pierce v. Society of SistersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Civil Rights CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API