E. T., Va. & Ga. R. R. v. Staub
Tennessee Supreme Court
FROM KNOX. Appeal in error from tbe Circuit Court of Knox county. S. A. Rodgers, J.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
Staub, the plaintiff below, obtaine 1 a verdict and judgment for $9,400. A new trial was- refused, and the defendant excepted and appealed in error. ''
It is conceded that the recovery was upon the first and fourth counts in the declaration, which state the cause of action substantially as follows, to-wit: That the plaintiff was in the employ of the company as a locomotive engineer, and in December, 1874, while in the discharge of his duties, received serious injuries in a collision between his engine and another train, by reason of the defendant’s negligence; that within twelve months — the…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Anderson-Gregory Co. v. LeaCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1963
- Boutwell v. Lewis Bros. Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1944
- Savage v. Spur Distributing Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1949
- MacHen v. Budd Wheel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Jeffers v. StanleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.