Legal Opinion

Keene v. Sappington

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 4, 1905PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Boone Circuit Court. — Hon. Alexander H. Waller, Judge. (1) Plaintiff’s statement cannot "be amended. Brashears v. Strock, 46 Mo. 221; Swartz v. Nicholson, 65 Mo. 508; Maxwell v. Quimby, 90 Mo. App. 469; Nutter v. Houston, 32 Mo. App. 451; Dahlgreen v. Yocum Bros., 44 Mo. App. 277; Nenno v. Railroad, 105 Mo. App. 540; Manley v. Mfg. Co., 103 Mo. App. 135; Drug Co. v. Johnson, 80 Mo. App. 428, and cases there cited; Terti v. Ins. Co., 76 Mo.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Boone Circuit Court. — Hon. Alexander H. Waller, Judge. (1) Plaintiff’s statement cannot "be amended. Brashears v. Strock, 46 Mo. 221; Swartz v. Nicholson, 65 Mo. 508; Maxwell v. Quimby, 90 Mo. App. 469; Nutter v. Houston, 32 Mo. App. 451; Dahlgreen v. Yocum Bros., 44 Mo. App. 277; Nenno v. Railroad, 105 Mo. App. 540; Manley v. Mfg. Co., 103 Mo. App. 135; Drug Co. v. Johnson, 80 Mo. App. 428, and cases there cited; Terti v. Ins. Co., 76 Mo. App. 42; Jackson v. Pulton, 87 Mo. App. 228; Rosenburg v. Boyd, 14 Mo. App. 429; R. S. 1899, sec. 4079. (2) Amendments to supply omissions are…

1Opinion of the CourtBroaddus, P. J.

— The plaintiff brought his suit in a justice’s court on the following account: .

*35“J. L. Sappington, Dr.

To John W. Keene...................205.00

Int. on same from Jan. 22,1904, to March

22,1904 .......... .............. 2.05

Total amount due..............207.05”

The defendant appealed to the circuit court where plaintiff was finally allowed to amend his statement. The amended statement was as follows:

“Columbia, Missouri,
“J. L. Sappington in account with John W. Keene, Dr. To one jack........................$205.00

Int. on same from January 22, 1904, to March 22,1904 ............... 2.05

Total…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brashears v. StrockSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
  2. Maxwell v. QuimbyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1901

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Phares v. Jaynes Lumber Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1906
  2. Union Brewing Co. v. EhlhardtMissouri Court of Appeals · 1909
  3. Warner v. CloseMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906
  4. Crandall v. DurhamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  5. Harvey v. LambertMissouri Court of Appeals · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API