Legal Opinion

Matter of Toth

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 10, 1997No. 71S00-9603-DI-256PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DISCIPLINARY ACTION

2Per curiam

The hearing officer appointed by this Court pursuant to Ind.Admission and Discipline Rule 23(11) has found that the respondent, Joseph M. Toth, after accepting retainer payments from clients, failed to take action on their behalf, failed to refund unearned portions of the retainers, and converted client funds to his own use. He also found that the respondent failed to promptly deliver settlement funds to a third party lienholder. For that misconduct, the hearing officer recommended that thé respondent be suspended frqm the practice of law for a period of not less than one…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Matter of NewmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1996

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re RobertsIndiana Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API