Legal Opinion

Holden v. Truck Insurance Exchange

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1957No. 3977Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Badt, C. J.:

Appellant Holden, a fare-paying passenger in a taxicab (one of a fleet of five) owned and operated by appellant Kimball, was injured when the taxi collided with *321a telephone post. In his suit against Kimball he joined respondent, Holden’s insurance carrier. NRS 706.500. Respondent’s answer denied coverage. Holden filed no reply. The court granted respondent’s motion for a separate trial on the issue of insurance coverage. Following a pretrial conference, at a trial of this issue before a jury, plaintiff made an offer of proof of facts in support of his…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dixie-Vortex Co. v. Paper Container Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
  2. McPhail v. Pacific Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1947
  3. United States Quarry Tile Co. v. Massachusetts Bonding & Ins.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API