Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Horvath

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 21, 2006PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 23, 2005, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Claimant worked for the employer as a sales assistant and hospitality director. She did not return to her position after April 2, 2004, when she was told that her duties would change under a new employment restructuring plan. Claimant thereafter commenced an age discrimination lawsuit against the employer which was resolved by a settlement agreement.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of AltmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. In re the Claim of ChenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. In re the Claim of HailstockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Matter of Scott (Commr. of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  2. Davis v. County of WestchesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  3. In re the Claim of DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API