Legal Opinion
Neenan v. Woodside Astoria Transportation Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 28, 1933PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrane, J.
On February 7, 1929, at the corner of Seventeenth avenue and Jamaica avenue, in the borough of Queens, New York City, a collision occurred between the automobile owned and operated by John J. Huppmann and a bus of the Woodside Astoria Transportation Co., Inc. Huppmann sued the transportation company for damages and proved that the collision was due solely to the negligence of its driver to which no carelessness on his part contributed. He recovered a judgment of $2,153.75 against the company.
Later, a passenger in the bus, Mary Neenan, sued both Huppmann and the Woodside Astoria Transportation…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Simson v. HartCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1816
- Beecher v. Peter A. Vogt Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Kretsch v. DenofrioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
- Ewen v. TerryNew York Supreme Court · 1828
- In re SteeleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
3Cited by28 opinions
- Good Health Dairy Products Corp. v. EmeryNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Mink v. KeimNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
- Tarkington v. Printing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Sloan v. Pinafore Homes Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
- First Security Mortgage Co. v. Goldmark Plastics Compounds, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1994
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.