American Mutual Liability Insurance v. Hicks
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Banke, Judge.
The sole issue presented in this appeal is whether funds due an employee from a workers’ compensation claim are subject to garnishment based upon a judgment for child support. Code Ann. § 114-302 provides that “[N]o claim for compensation under this title shall be assignable, and all compensation and claims therefor shall be exempt from all claims of creditors.” Held:
Although we have discovered no decisions of our courts considering the quoted statute, other exemptions from garnishment have been addressed as they relate to claims for alimony and child support. We conclude as did…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bates v. BatesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
- Caldwell v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1924
- Hilltop Auto Salvage, Inc. v. MasonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
3Cited by3 opinions
- Willis v. McClain Industries of Georgia, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
- Cromer v. DenmarkSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
- Travelers Insurance v. MoxleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981