Legal Opinion

Davidson v. Lane

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided March 9, 1978PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WILLIAM H. INMAN, Special Judge.

The purely equitable relief of reformation of a written instrument being denied them, appellants seek review of the judgment which is predicated on a legal conclusion that mutuality of mistake must always appear as a prerequisite to the reformation. The assignments of error are directed to this conclusion.

Appellants are the heirs at law of B. C. Davidson, who executed, with his wife, a deed in 1971 to the Valley View Missionary Baptist Church conveying .16 acre. It is this deed which appellants seek to have reformed. They allege that the grantors…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Fritz v. FritzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  2. Ferrell v. FerrellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Andrews v. AndrewsIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  4. Jones v. McNealySupreme Court of Alabama · 1903
  5. Crockett v. CrockettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Yano v. YanoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  2. Pullum v. PullumSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
  3. Wright v. SampsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Janette Sue Jackson v. Jay Thomas JacksonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API