Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. 191.07 Acres of Land, and Milan Martinek

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 4, 2007No. 04-35131Published

1DissentLeavy, Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent from Part II.B of the majority opinion which concludes that Martinek has no right to a jury trial of the issue of just compensation for the property interest taken by the United States through filing of the Declaration of Taking. In this case, there were two takings: one by inverse condemnation through government regulation which began on the date stipulated by the parties and ended when the government filed its Declaration of Taking; and the other by direct condemnation which occurred when the government filed its Declaration of Taking. When Martinek filed his inverse…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Kirby Forest Industries, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. United States v. DowSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Donald Lorentsen v. Robert A. Hood, 1 Warden, Federal Correctional Institution Sheridan OrCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
  5. United States v. 101.88 Acres of LandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API