Gurney Industries, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance
District Court, W.D. North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum of Decision and Order
McMILLAN, District Judge.
THE NATURE OF THE CASE
Gurney Industries, plaintiff, sued St. Paul, the defendant, for alleged damages and for alleged equitable relief due to alleged non-performance of a contract by the two Roberts companies, the principals on St. Paul’s performance bond. The case was tried without a jury in three installments for a total of twenty-one days. Testimony at the trial, not counting depositions and exhibits, amounts to twenty-five hundred pages. Essential findings of fact and conclusions of law follow.
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Howard v. Stillwell & Bierce Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Boyle v. . ReederSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1841
- United States ex rel. R. E. Lee Electric Co. v. StackDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1968
- Tompkins v. Dallas Cotton MillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
- United States v. StackCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1970
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gurney Industries, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, and Robert P. Perrin, Trustee in Reorganization for Roberts Company and Roberts Engineers, Inc., Gurney Industries, Inc., and Commercial Credit Industrial Corporation v. Robert P. Perrin, Trustee in Reorganization for Roberts Company and Roberts Engineers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972
- LCS Homes, Inc. v. Driggs Building Systems, Inc. (In Re LCS Homes, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1989
- Gurney Industries, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972