Legal Opinion
Siveke v. Keena
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 24, 1981PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Bernard F. McCaffrey, J.
The petitioner, Grace Siveke, brought this writ of habeas corpus in order to compel the respondents, Janet Keena and Charles Keena, to return to the marital residence her husband, John Siveke, who is also the father of respondent, Janet Keena. The petitioner wife contends that she, not the stepdaughter, Janet Keena, is the proper and appropriate person to have custody of John Siveke.
The petitioner contends that her research revealed no case precedents or statutory authority to substantiate her contention that she, as the wife of John Siveke, has a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hoff v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- People v. SchildhausNew York Court of Appeals · 1960
- People Ex Rel. Bridges v. MalcolmNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- In re the Appointment of a Committee of the Person & Property of WestAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
- People ex rel. Harris v. Commissioner of WelfareNew York Supreme Court · 1947
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Brevorka ex rel. Wittle v. SchuseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Wilner v. ProwdaNew York Supreme Court · 1993
- Barbour v. PeopleNew York Supreme Court · 1994
- Nonhuman Rights Project, Inc. ex rel. Hercules v. StanleyNew York Supreme Court · 2015
- People ex rel. Tara P. v. DiStefanoNew York City Family Court · 1989