Legal Opinion

Woll v. Dugas

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided November 30, 1970PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

112 N.J. Super. 366 (1970)

271 A.2d 443

ALBERT WOLL AND VIRGINIA WOLL, EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF WILLARD WOLL, DECEASED, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS AND CROSS-APPELLANTS,

v.

MATTHEW DUGAS, AN INFANT BY HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, JOHN D. MORRISON, GRAHAM C. DUGAS, JR., JANE DUGAS FROJEN AND AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS AND CROSS-RESPONDENTS, AND CITIZENS FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF RIDGEWOOD, NEW JERSEY, AS EXECUTOR AND TRUSTEE OF THE WILL OF CELEONOR E. WOLL (KNOWN ALSO AS ELEONOR WOLL), DECEASED, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued November 17, 1970.

D…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Woll v. DugasNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
  2. ORADELL VILLAGE v. Township of WayneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
  3. Oradell Village v. Township of WayneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Matter of ConroySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  2. Duggan v. KetoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. State v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
  4. In re Estate of CosmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
  5. Danelczyk v. TynekNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API