Legal Opinion

Rowe v. Kohle

California Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1854PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the Tenth Judicial District.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Ch. J. Murray

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Mr. J. Heydenpeldt concurred.

This suit was originally commenced against Amelia Kohle and her husband, upon an alleged promise to pay the plaintiffs for legal services rendered in defending him in a criminal prosecution.

Judgment by default was taken against the husband.

The wife demurred to the complaint, upon the ground that as a femme covert she was unable, during coverture, to bind herself by contract, unless the same related to her separate estate, which was sustained by the Court; from which decision the plaintiffs appealed.

We have…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Drais v. HoganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Vantilburg v. BlackMontana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Luning v. BradyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
  4. Spangler v. SellersUnited States Circuit Court · 1881
  5. Bayerque v. HaleyUnited States Circuit Court · 1856

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API