In the Matter of S.F.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion by:
SARAH B. DUNCAN, Justice,
joined by Justice ANGELINI.
S.F. preserved his right to appeal the trial court’s suppression ruling by timely filing a motion specifying his complaint and obtaining a ruling on his motion on the record. See Tex. R. App. P. 33.1(a). There fore, unlike the majority, I would not hold S.F.’s guilty plea was rendered involuntary by an erroneous belief that he could appeal the suppression ruling or, on that basis, reverse the trial court’s judgment and remand the cause for further proceedings. Nor would I reverse on unassigned error, as the majority…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Verburgt v. DornerTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- Helms v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Flowers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- In the Matter of C.O.S.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
- R.S.C., Matter OfCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.