Legal Opinion

Edmondston v. Estate of Fountain

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided December 10, 2003No. CA 02-842PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Andree Layton Roaf, Judge.

This case involves the trial court’s denial of a petition to probate an instrument as the holographic will of Oral W. Fountain. Sharon Kay Edmondston, Mrs. Fountain’s daughter, appeals. Ms. Edmondston argues that the trial court erred because the decedent clearly intended that the instrument she wrote be her last will. We agree, and reverse and remand.

The instrument at issue in this case, a copy of which is attached to this opinion as an Appendix, was written entirely by the decedent, Mrs. Oral W. Fountain, and was signed by her and by two witnesses at her request.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Arendt v. ArendtSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
  2. Matter of Estate of O'DonnellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  3. Chambers v. YounesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
  4. McDonald v. PettySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  5. Dunn v. MeansSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Edmundson v. Estate of FountainSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API