Legal Opinion
Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Drenocky
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 7, 2016No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:15-CV-762PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
' MEMORANDUM
Christopher C. Conner, Chief Judge
The Cincinnati Insurance Company (“Cincinnati”) seeks declaratory judgment against policyholders Jonathan and Deborah Drenocky (the “Drenoekys”), arguing numerous contractual exclusions bar coverage of the Drenoekys’ insurance claim for water damage. Cincinnati now moves for partial judgment on the pleadings (Doc, 20), pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c). The court will deny Cincinnati’s motion.
I. Factual Background and Procedural History
This dispute arises out of an insurance claim for water damage to the Drenoekys’ residence. The…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Jeffrey J. Sikirica, Esq., as Trustee of Pittsburgh Beauty Academy, Inc. v. Nationwide Insurance Company Jeffrey J. SikiricaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Victor Zavala v. Wal Mart Stores IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Atiyeh v. National Fire Ins. Co. of HartfordDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- DiCarlo v. St. Mary HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. PazDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2024