Legal Opinion
Claim of Hasbrouck v. International Business Machines Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 29, 2007PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMugglin, J.
Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed February 3, 2006, which ruled, inter alia, that an employer-employee relationship existed between claimant and International Business Machines Corporation.
Robert Floss is the owner of Colonial City Moving & Storage, a company that contracted with International Business Machines Corporation (hereinafter IBM) in approximately 1990 to, among other things, provide labor and services necessary for the transportation and packing of certain IBM equipment, which included cables that were up to 400 feet long. Hired and paid by Floss as…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Claim of Shoemaker v. Manpower, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Claim of Mehar v. Skyline Credit Ride, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Arteaga v. ISS Quality ServiceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
3Cited by5 opinions
- Claim of Perez v. LiceaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Jara v. SMJ Environmental, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Cabrera v. Two-Three-Nought-Four AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Claim of Thomas S. v. Steel Style, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Long v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008