Legal Opinion

Haynes v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 23, 1994No. 93-2211PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We affirm in all respects except one. The State concedes the trial court erred in imposing consecutive sentences for count I and count III. Therefore, sentences for count I and III should run concurrently.

Accordingly, we affirm the convictions and sentences, except for the State’s concession of sentencing error and remand to the trial court.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED.

GUNTHER and STEVENSON, JJ., and BARR, ROBBIE M., Associate Judge, concur.

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tampa Television, Inc. v. NormanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994