Legal Opinion
Haynes v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided November 23, 1994No. 93-2211PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Per curiam
We affirm in all respects except one. The State concedes the trial court erred in imposing consecutive sentences for count I and count III. Therefore, sentences for count I and III should run concurrently.
Accordingly, we affirm the convictions and sentences, except for the State’s concession of sentencing error and remand to the trial court.
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED.
GUNTHER and STEVENSON, JJ., and BARR, ROBBIE M., Associate Judge, concur.
2Cited by1 opinion
- Tampa Television, Inc. v. NormanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994