Legal Opinion

Grindle v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 4, 1979No. 58202PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Deen, Chief Judge.

Alfred Charles Grindle was tried by a jury and convicted of robbery by sudden snatching.

1. Appellant contends that the trial court erred in failing to charge on the law of circumstantial evidence although such a charge was not requested.

"A charge on circumstantial evidence is required only when the case is wholly dependent thereon. [Cit.]” Cowans v. State, 145 Ga. App. 693 (244 SE2d 624) (1978). In this case, the evidence against the appellant was not wholly circumstantial; the victim gave positive in-court identification of the accused as the person who robbed him.

2.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ridley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  2. Spencer v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  3. Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  4. Cawthon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
  5. Cowans v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Doughty v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  2. English v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  3. Jordan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  4. Chambers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  5. Howard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API