Grindle v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Deen, Chief Judge.
Alfred Charles Grindle was tried by a jury and convicted of robbery by sudden snatching.
1. Appellant contends that the trial court erred in failing to charge on the law of circumstantial evidence although such a charge was not requested.
"A charge on circumstantial evidence is required only when the case is wholly dependent thereon. [Cit.]” Cowans v. State, 145 Ga. App. 693 (244 SE2d 624) (1978). In this case, the evidence against the appellant was not wholly circumstantial; the victim gave positive in-court identification of the accused as the person who robbed him.
2.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ridley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
- Spencer v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
- Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Cawthon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
- Cowans v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
3Cited by14 opinions
- Doughty v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- English v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- Jordan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Chambers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- Howard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.