Legal Opinion

Blanco v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 11, 1992No. 91-2542PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The state moved to have the defendant, a fifteen-year-old juvenile, tried as an adult for the offense of armed robbery. The court granted the motion and, thereafter, a jury found him guilty as charged. We reject the defendant’s present claims that the trial court erred in ordering him shackled during jury selection and at trial, and in sentencing him as an adult.

The court is under an obligation to maintain safety and security in the courtroom. This obligation outweighs, under proper circumstances, the risk that the security measures may impair the defendant’s presumption of innocence. Diaz v. *133…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Corley v. MeeseSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Dufour v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  4. Diaz v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  5. Pimentel v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jackson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API