Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Clark v. Clark

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided August 13, 1875Published

From Grafton Circuit Court. In Equity. The bill is brought by Eliza H. Clark, of Enfield, in this comity, and Clara E. Matthews, of St. Johusbury, Yt., her daughter, against George W. Clark, husband and father of the plaintiffs, and Daniel Tilden of Lebanon, in this county. The plaintiffs allege, that on November 11,1854, the said George TV.

Read the full summary

From Grafton Circuit Court. In Equity. The bill is brought by Eliza H. Clark, of Enfield, in this comity, and Clara E. Matthews, of St. Johusbury, Yt., her daughter, against George W. Clark, husband and father of the plaintiffs, and Daniel Tilden of Lebanon, in this county. The plaintiffs allege, that on November 11,1854, the said George TV. Clark executed a mortgage of certain real estate, situate in Enfield, conveyed to him by Lorenzo Day, to Samuel H. Clark, his father, to secure him for signing as surety for the said George W. a promissory note for $1,200, of even date with said mortgage,…

1Concurrence

A chronological statement of the facts to be gathered from the bill and amendments appears to be as follows: November 11, 1854, George W. Clark executed to his father, Samuel H. Clark, a mortgage of certain land in Enfield, to secure him for his liability on a $1,200 note to Lorenzo Day, the whole of which said Samuel H. subsequently paid for the benefit of George W. June 6, 1866, George W. Clark executed another mortgage to his father of land in Canaan, to secure the payment of two notes from him to his father, set out in the bill. November 20, 1856, Samuel H. Clark made his last will,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Clough v. RussellSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1875

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API