Blankenship v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Judge Cammack
Reversing.
Leo Blankenship was convicted of having carnal knowledge of a female under the age of 15 years and sentenced to five years’ imprisonment. From that judgment this appeal is taken on the grounds that (1) neither the law nor the evidence sustains the conviction; and (2) the court erred in failing to instruct on the whole law of the case.
Little of the evidence needs to be detailed. The prosecuting witness and a girl companion testified that Blankenship compelled the prosecuting witness to leave her companions on the road and go to a bottom with him at the point of a gun.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Nider v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
- Blankenship v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
- Morgan v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
3Cited by6 opinions
- Trimble v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1969
- Johnny Ray Bagby v. Dewey SowdersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- George v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1971
- Johnny Ray Bagby v. Dewey SowdersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Johnny Ray Bagby v. Dewey Sowders, Warden, Northpoint Training CenterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.