Legal Opinion
Decardenas v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided April 3, 1990No. 89-73PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Per curiam
Affirmed. D’Oench, Duhme & Co. v. FDIC, 315 U.S. 447, 62 S.Ct. 676, 86 L.Ed. 956 (1942); FDIC v. McClanahan, 795 F.2d 512 (5th Cir.1986); FDIC v. Investors Assocs. X., Ltd., 775 F.2d 152 (6th Cir.1985); FDIC v. Berr, 643 F.Supp. 357 (D.Kan.1986); Scott v. NCNB Nat’l Bank of Fla., 489 So.2d 221, 223 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986).
2Cases cited5 opinions
- D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Henry E. McClanahanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Investors Associates X., Ltd. And Milton A. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. BerrDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1986
- Scott v. NCNB Nat. Bank of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
3Cited by1 opinion
- MMH VENTURE v. Masterpiece Products, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990