Legal Opinion

Quinn v. Morganelli

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided October 28, 2008No. 07-P-1804PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCohen, J.

In this premises liability action, the plaintiff appeals from the allowance by a judge of the Superior Court of the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. We conclude that there remain genuine issues of material fact and that the case should not have been resolved as matter of law.

Background. Viewing the summary judgment record in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, see Augat, Inc. v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 410 Mass. 117, 120 (1991), the relevant facts *51may be summarized as follows. On September 14, 2003, the plaintiff visited the defendants’ residence along with her longtime…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Augat, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. Mounsey v. EllardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  3. Ralph D. Smith and Thelma Smith v. Arbaugh's Restaurant, Inc., a Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  4. O'Sullivan v. ShawMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  5. Davis v. Westwood GroupMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Dos Santos v. ColetaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
  2. Cracchiolo v. Eastern Fisheries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
  3. Soederberg v. Concord Greene Condominium AssociationMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2010
  4. Nna v. American Standard, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009
  5. Barrasso v. Hillview West Condominium TrustMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API