Legal Opinion

Gust v. Montgomery Ward & Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 4, 1935PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.

Plaintiff brought suit to recover damages on account of certain slanderous words used toward her by one of defendant’s, employees in its store in Joplin, Missouri. On trial to a jury, plaintiff, appellant here, recovered a verdict in the sum of $1500. Thereafter the trial court sustained defendant’s motion for new trial and plaintiff has appealed from the order granting the new trial.

The motion for new trial contained a number of grounds, one of which was, that the trial court erred in refusing to give an instruction for defendant in the nature of a demurrer to the evidence offered at the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Holmes v. Royal Fraternal UnionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  2. Peak v. TaubmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
  3. Wagner v. ScottSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
  4. Conrad v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1934
  5. Garey v. JacksonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Scott-Burr Stores Corp. v. EdgarMississippi Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Estes v. Lawton-Byrne-Bruner Insurance Agency Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. Williams v. Kansas City Transit, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1960
  4. Broking v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Hayden v. ForytMississippi Supreme Court · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API