Henkemeyer v. Boxall
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVIES, Judge.
Appellant commenced what appeared to be a medical malpractice action for failure to discover and advise decedent Jansky of the presence of an acute aneurysm. Appellant conceded no physician-patient relationship existed, but argued application of ordinary negligence principles precluded dismissal. The trial court granted summary judgment, concluding lack of a physician-patient relationship barred appellant’s claim as a matter of law. We affirm.
FACTS
On August 3, 1987, Peter Jansky was injured driving a truck for Brian Brix Excavating Company. Twenty months later, Brix and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hubred v. Control Data Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Larson v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Depue v. FlatauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Keene v. WigginsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Rogers v. HorvathMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Harris v. KreutzerSupreme Court of Virginia · 2006
- Greenberg v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- Sime v. Tvenge Associates Architects & Planners, P.C.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Hafner v. BeckCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
- Smith v. WelchSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.