Legal Opinion

Henkemeyer v. Boxall

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided February 5, 1991No. C2-90-1796PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVIES, Judge.

Appellant commenced what appeared to be a medical malpractice action for failure to discover and advise decedent Jansky of the presence of an acute aneurysm. Appellant conceded no physician-patient relationship existed, but argued application of ordinary negligence principles precluded dismissal. The trial court granted summary judgment, concluding lack of a physician-patient relationship barred appellant’s claim as a matter of law. We affirm.

FACTS

On August 3, 1987, Peter Jansky was injured driving a truck for Brian Brix Excavating Company. Twenty months later, Brix and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hubred v. Control Data Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  2. Larson v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Depue v. FlatauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  4. Keene v. WigginsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. Rogers v. HorvathMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Harris v. KreutzerSupreme Court of Virginia · 2006
  2. Greenberg v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  3. Sime v. Tvenge Associates Architects & Planners, P.C.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Hafner v. BeckCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  5. Smith v. WelchSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API