Legal Opinion

State v. Peck

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1928No. 6,317PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matthews

One Clinton Peck was placed on trial in Fergus county on an information charging him with grand larceny. At the close of the taking of testimony, on motion of defendant, the court ordered him discharged and excused the jury from further consideration of the case on the ground of failure of proof and on the stated belief of the trial judge that, should the jury be permitted to consider the case and it should return a verdict of guilty, the court would not be justified in pronouncing sentence thereon, or in denying defendant a new trial if motion therefor was made.

We have before us a record…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. People v. WebbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  2. People v. StollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. State v. WelchMontana Supreme Court · 1899
  4. People v. HornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  5. State v. MahoneyMontana Supreme Court · 1900

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. BrunnWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  2. State v. CoolMontana Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State v. HagerudMontana Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State v. SanchezMontana Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. WrightMontana Supreme Court · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API