Legal Opinion

Moore v. Dudley

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided July 19, 2002No. 87,512PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Pierron, J.:

This case involves the failure of Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company, Inc. (Farm Bureau) to pay all of the personal injury protection (PIP) benefits to Maureen Moore following an automobile accident. The trial court ruled that Farm Bureau did not unreasonably refuse to pay PIP benefits and that no attorney fees would be allowed for the judgment recovered. We affirm.

Moore was a passenger in a vehicle when it was rear-ended by a Chevrolet Suburban in 1997. Moore filed a personal injury action against the driver of the Suburban for damages and also against Farm Bureau for PIP…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Saucedo v. WingerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  2. Koch, Administratrix v. Prudential Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1970
  3. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. CarrSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  4. Brown v. Combined Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979
  5. Smith v. BlackwellCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bussman v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API