Legal Opinion
Kaufman v. Farah
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 16, 1952PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCohh, J.
This action was instituted by plaintiff, an attorney at law, to recover compensation from defendant for professional services rendered on behalf of defendant’s wife and children.
The previous complaint served by plaintiff was held insufficient by this court and dismissed upon the ground that it stated only conclusions (276 App. Div. 178, 179). The Court of Appeals, agreeing that the pleading was insufficient, modified the judgment of dismissal by providing that plaintiff might serve an amended complaint (303 N. Y. 819). Availing himself of the privilege thus afforded, plaintiff has now served…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Naumer v. GrayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
- Lanyon's Detective Agency, Inc. v. CochraneNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Steuer v. HartAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- Kaufman v. FarahNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
3Cited by6 opinions
- Solazzo v. OcchinoNew York Supreme Court · 1957
- Winston v. WinstonNew York City Family Court · 1975
- Cardozo v. GulackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
- Levine v. RaymondAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956
- Rosenblatt v. WolfAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.