Botsford v. O'Conner
Illinois Supreme Court
Appeal from the Superior Court of Chicago; the Hon. Joseph E. Gary, Judge, presiding. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Walker
The undisputed facts in this case are, that Charles O’Conner, being seized in fee of the premises in controversy, died on the 1st of March, 1858, intestate, leaving, surviving him, a widow .and two minor children. His widow was then enceinte, and was afterward delivered of a female child, which was named Ann O’Conner, and who, not then being born, was not made a party with the other heirs to a proceeding subsequently had for the sale of the real estate of intestate, for the payment of liis debts. On the 4th day of March, 1858, Ann O’Conner, the Avidow, Avas appointed administratrix of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Clark v. ThompsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1868
- Ball v. ShattuckIllinois Supreme Court · 1855
- McConnel v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
- Detrick v. MigattIllinois Supreme Court · 1857
3Cited by19 opinions
- Harris v. LesterIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
- Law v. GrommesIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
- Barnett v. WolfIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
- Figge v. RowlenIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
- Hunter v. StoneburnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1879
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.