Legal Opinion

Darling Shops, Inc. v. Lord's Specialty Shop, Inc.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided January 9, 1947PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Memorandum The court below was warranted in concluding that the landlord did not prove that it sought in good faith to recover possession of the premises for its own immediate and personal use. The addition of the phrase “ without prejudice to a renewal thereof ’ ’ had no special significance (N. Y. City Mun. Ct. Code, § 125; L. 1915, ch. 279, as amd.; Saraga v. Strauss, 208 App. Div. 66); in any event, where a landlord seeks to recover possession, an earlier decision based *340on the failure to meet the statutory requirements is a binding adjudication only as to the situation as it existed at…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Saraga v. StraussAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Harnick v. JawitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API