Kolesinski v. Mashey
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Per curiam
The only real question upon this appeal is whether the finding of the referee that the bankrupt deliberately concealed the Levine judgment when he was examined in supplementary proceedings, was “clearly erroneous.” Rule 53(e)(2), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c. Concededly he did in fact conceal this judgment when asked to produce all judgments in his favor, although he produced several others which were older and worthless. The referee declared himself “satisfied” that there were reasonable grounds for believing that the bankrupt had done this knowingly,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In re BerryDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1906
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bankr. L. Rep. P 73,158 United States of America v. William GoodsteinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- In Re FreudmannDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
- Murfreesboro Production Credit Ass'n v. Harris (In Re Harris)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1980
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Morris (In Re Morris)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1985
- United States v. Alvin Klupt and Purchasing Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.