Legal Opinion

Dulaney v. Louisville & Nashville R. R.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 9, 1897PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Case 87 — PETITIONS EQUITY APPEALS FROM JEFFERSON CIRCUIT. COURT, CHANCERY DIVISION. 1. The appeal granted in the Dulaney case on October 18, 1893, from the judgment entered August 21, 1893, was in time and is a valid appeal, notwithstanding the court below entered the judgment of August 21, 1893, “ nunc pro tunc as of March 30, 1883.” Entering a judgment nunc pro tunc does not affect the right of appeal. Ky. Code, secs. 390, 392, 393, 368, 374; Ky.

Read the full summary

Case 87 — PETITIONS EQUITY APPEALS FROM JEFFERSON CIRCUIT. COURT, CHANCERY DIVISION. 1. The appeal granted in the Dulaney case on October 18, 1893, from the judgment entered August 21, 1893, was in time and is a valid appeal, notwithstanding the court below entered the judgment of August 21, 1893, “ nunc pro tunc as of March 30, 1883.” Entering a judgment nunc pro tunc does not affect the right of appeal. Ky. Code, secs. 390, 392, 393, 368, 374; Ky. Stats., sec. 378; Johnson v. Com., 80 Ky., 377; Rubber v. Goodyear, 6 Wallace, 153; Coon v. Grand Lodge, 76 Cal., 254; Rose Estate, 72 Cal., 577;…

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGE HAZELRIGG

delivebed the opinion or the coubt.

In 1882, the general council of the city of Louisville adopted an ordinance permitting the appellee, the ■Chesapeake, Ohio and South Western Railroad Company to construct and operate a railroad, with single or double track, along and over “A” street, through the city limits, and provided that all other railroads so desiring might use such tracks upon making proper arrangements therefor with that company. Thereupon the Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co. under a contract with the C., O. & S. W. Co. was about to construct such tracks when the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lexington & Ohio Rail Road v. ApplegateCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1839
  2. Fulton v. Short Route Railway Transfer Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1887
  3. Cornwall v. Lou. & Nash. R. R.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1888
  4. Newport & Cincinnati Bridge Co. v. FooteCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1872
  5. Corley v. LancasterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1883

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Husband v. CottonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  2. Rural Home Tel'p Co. v. Ky. & Ind. Tel'p Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
  3. Lee v. MacHtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API