Legal Opinion

United States v. Phillips

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided July 8, 1987No. ACM 25750PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

MURDOCK, Judge:

A military judge sitting alone as a general court-martial found the appellant guilty of several drug offenses. The appellant now asserts that the pretrial agreement limits a fundamental right, cannot be enforced because it is not sufficiently definite or certain, and that the judge did not sufficiently question the appellant’s understanding of the provision. Although we do *813not find merit in his assertions, some discussion of the pretrial agreement is warranted.

The pretrial agreement follows the standard Air Force format found in Air Force Regulation 111-1. Military…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. SaulterU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1986
  2. United States v. CamposU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1987

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. KyleU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1991
  2. United States v. DorseyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1987
  3. States v. RiveraUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1996
  4. United States v. RobinsonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API