United States v. Phillips
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
MURDOCK, Judge:
A military judge sitting alone as a general court-martial found the appellant guilty of several drug offenses. The appellant now asserts that the pretrial agreement limits a fundamental right, cannot be enforced because it is not sufficiently definite or certain, and that the judge did not sufficiently question the appellant’s understanding of the provision. Although we do *813not find merit in his assertions, some discussion of the pretrial agreement is warranted.
The pretrial agreement follows the standard Air Force format found in Air Force Regulation 111-1. Military…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. SaulterU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1986
- United States v. CamposU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1987
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. KyleU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1991
- United States v. DorseyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1987
- States v. RiveraUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1996
- United States v. RobinsonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1987