Legal Opinion
Honeywell International, Inc. v. Guilder
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided December 23, 2009No. 3D08-1747PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION
2Per curiam
On motion for clarification, we withdraw our slip opinion dated October 28, 2009, and substitute the following amended opinion:
Honeywell International, Inc. (“Honeywell”) appeals an adverse final judgment awarding Stephen Guilder (“Guilder”) and his children damages in the amount of $24,170,000.00, for injuries sustained from asbestos exposure. We reverse.
In the 1970’s and 1980’s, Guilder was exposed to chrysotile asbestos when he: remodeled an attic, worked as a road construction worker, and repaired automobiles. More than twenty years later, Guilder developed…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Fabre v. MarinSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- Wells v. Tallahassee Mem. Med. CenterSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
- WR Grace & Co.-Conn. v. DoughertyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- MCI Exp., Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
4Cited by4 opinions
- Kelly v. Georgia-Pacific, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- Northrop Grumman Sys. Corp. v. BrittDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- Northrop Grumman Systems Corp., Etc. v. BrittDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- Philip Morris USA v. GlogerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019