Legal Opinion · Dissent

Southeastern Pennsylvania Synod of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America v. Meena

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 18, 2011No. 2498 C.D. 2009Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION BY

Judge LEAVITT.

I respectfully dissent. The majority holds that the Synod’s decision to close Redeemer and take control of its property was an ecclesiastical matter over which the courts lack jurisdiction. However, the validity of the Synod’s action turns on a question of corporate governance that can be decided under neutral principles of Pennsylvania corporation law. Specifically, Redeemer contends that the Synod’s action was ultra vires because it was not authorized by the Synod’s Articles of Incorporation. I would remand that question to the trial court for disposition.

T…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Presbytery of Beaver-Butler v. Middlesex Presbyterian ChurchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Weiss v. Musical Mutual Protective UnionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  3. Dugan v. Firemen's Pension FundSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  4. March v. Fairmount Creamery Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API