Glover v. State

Birdsong, Presiding Judge.

James Glover appeals his conviction for the offense of burglary. Held-.

The defendant contends his conviction is “illegal” as it was based “solely on fingerprint evidence and it was not established that the fingerprints could only have been impressed at the time when the crime was committed, and the remaining circumstantial evidence did not exclude every other reasonable hypothesis save that of guilt of the accused.” (Emphasis supplied.) We do not agree that defendant’s conviction was based “solely” on fingerprint evidence, and this conclu sion is supported by…