Holloway v. City of Oberlin
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
SULLIVAN, Judge.
| ¶ Truell Holloway appeals a judgment that dismissed his claims against the City of Oberlin (the City) with prejudice. We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Holloway filed suit against his employer, the City, on October 12, 2006, as a result of an incident that had happened at work on February 21, 2006, when a co-worker, Travis Slate, put something into a can of juice that Holloway later consumed. Holloway alleged that, as a result of his having ingested the tampered juice, he became ill and now suffers from severe physical and mental problems. Holloway averred that because…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- LeBrane v. LewisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
- Baumeister v. PlunkettSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
- Miller v. KeatingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
- Benoit v. Capitol Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Scott v. Commercial Union Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Stanley v. Crowell & Owens, LLCLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
- Carolyn Gay Stanley v. Crowell & Owens, LLCLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
- Lynch v. Fluor Federal Petroleum Operation, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2020