State v. Gray

JENKINS,

and assigns reasons

I concur in the majority’s opinion to affirm defendant’s conviction and sentence. I write separately because I find that- the defendant did not preserve for appeal his assignment of error.'

In defendant’s sole assignment of error he argues “the trial court abused its discretion by allowing the introduction of ‘expert’ testimony as to Mr. Gray’s alleged gang affiliation.”' The majority appropriately notes that at nó time during trial was an objection raised as to Det. Bakewell’s expertise to testify in this matter. I note defendant’s argument that “the Daubert factors…