Legal Opinion

Brown v. Kildea

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1910No. 8304PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Huneke, J., entered June 2, 1909, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action to recover a penalty.

1Opinion of the CourtGose, J.

This action was brought by the plaintiff as a stockholder of the Montana Scotch Bonnet Copper and Gold Mining Company, a corporation, against the defendants, its officers and trustees, for the recovery of a penalty, and is based on §§ 3701 and 3702, Rem. & Bal. Code, which are as follows:

“§3701. It shall be the duty of the trustees of every company incorporated under this chapter to keep a book containing the names of all persons, alphabetically arranged, who are or shall be stockholders of the corporation, and showing the number of shares of stock held by them respectively, and the time when…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Steam-Engine Co. v. HubbardSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. Casey v. St. Louis Transit Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1905
  4. State ex rel. Weinberg v. Pacific Brewing & Malting Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Brown v. ClowIndiana Supreme Court · 1902

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re DemingWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Babcock v. HarrschIllinois Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Orvine H. Schaefer v. H. B. Green Transportation Line, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1956
  4. Wood, Walker & Co., a Partnership, by John C. Tilney, Individually and as a Partner of Wood, Walker & Co. v. Fred M. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
  5. Deming v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API