In re Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
In Admiralty. Petition by the Great Rakes Dredge & Dock Company for limitation of liability, as owner of drill boat No. 4. Decision on commissioner’s report.
1Opinion of the Court
MORTON, District Judge.
As to the damage claimant’s motion to ■amend:
[1] It does not appear that the petitioner was in any way misled in the presentation of its case by the statement of the amount of damages contained in the libel, nor that it has in any way altered its position in reliance thereon. The motion to amend is allowed. The Minnetonka, 145 Fed. 509, 514, 77 C. C. A. 217 (C. C. A. 2d Cir.); The Charles Morgan, 115 U. S. 69, 75, 5 Sup. Ct. 1172, 29 L. Ed. 316. As to the exceptions to the commissioner’s report;
I have carefully considered the numerous exceptions taken by both parties to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- The Albert DumoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Redfield v. Ystalyfera Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
- The Charles MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- The ScotlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- The SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Moore-Mccormack Lines, Inc. v. AmiraultCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1953
- United States v. The M/v Zoe Colocotroni, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
- Petition of A/S J. Ludwig Mowinckels RederiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- The North AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1928
- In re Buckeye S. S. Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1950
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.