Grant v. Clairol, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT, DISCUSSION, AND CONCLUSION OF LAW
HUYETT, District Judge.
Following a hearing on December 3, 1986, I make the following findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Fed.R. Civ.P. 52(a):
1. The complaint in this action was initially filed on May 21, 1985. By leave of the court, the complaint was amended on September 26, 1985 to cure a lack of complete diversity.
2. The complaint alleges that the plaintiff was injured by a hair dye manufactured, distributed and sold by the defendant, and asserts that defendant is liable to the plaintiff on theories of strict product…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lefteri Poulis and Athena Poulis, His Wife v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Compagnie Des Bauxites De Guinea v. Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Frederick A. Carter v. Albert Einstein Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- In Re Professional Hockey Antitrust Litigation. (d.c. No. M.D.L. 119) Appeal of Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc. And Golden Blades Hockey, Inc. (Six Cases). World Hockey Association (d.c. Civ. No. 72--1995) v. National Hockey League World Hockey Association (d.c. Civ. No. 73--19) v. Nassau Sports, Etc. (Two Cases). Nassau Sports, a Limited Partnership, (d.c. Civ. No. 74--162) v. Garry Peters and Golden Blades Hockey, Inc., Intervenor-Defendant (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Commonwealth v. BurgessMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997