Legal Opinion

Grant v. Clairol, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 4, 1986No. Civ. No. 85-2866PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT, DISCUSSION, AND CONCLUSION OF LAW

HUYETT, District Judge.

Following a hearing on December 3, 1986, I make the following findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Fed.R. Civ.P. 52(a):

1. The complaint in this action was initially filed on May 21, 1985. By leave of the court, the complaint was amended on September 26, 1985 to cure a lack of complete diversity.

2. The complaint alleges that the plaintiff was injured by a hair dye manufactured, distributed and sold by the defendant, and asserts that defendant is liable to the plaintiff on theories of strict product…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lefteri Poulis and Athena Poulis, His Wife v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  2. National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Compagnie Des Bauxites De Guinea v. Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  4. Frederick A. Carter v. Albert Einstein Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
  5. In Re Professional Hockey Antitrust Litigation. (d.c. No. M.D.L. 119) Appeal of Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc. And Golden Blades Hockey, Inc. (Six Cases). World Hockey Association (d.c. Civ. No. 72--1995) v. National Hockey League World Hockey Association (d.c. Civ. No. 73--19) v. Nassau Sports, Etc. (Two Cases). Nassau Sports, a Limited Partnership, (d.c. Civ. No. 74--162) v. Garry Peters and Golden Blades Hockey, Inc., Intervenor-Defendant (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. BurgessMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API