Legal Opinion

Lee v. . Horton

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 1, 1887PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered upon an order made February 10, 1885, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered upon a decision of the court on trial without a jury. The nature of the action and the material facts are stated in the opinion. The notes are void on their face.

Read the full summary

Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered upon an order made February 10, 1885, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered upon a decision of the court on trial without a jury. The nature of the action and the material facts are stated in the opinion. The notes are void on their face. (Story on Promissory Notes, §§ 22, 23; Chitty on Bills, ch. III, 37.) The court having jurisdiction of the cause of action, it was only after it had reformed the notes that it could acquire th'e right incidentally to give relief in…

1Opinion of the Court

Ruger, Ch. J.

This action was brought against the administrator of the estate of William J. Horton, to recover money claimed to be due, under circumstances related in two written instruments reading substantially alike except as to amount, and being as follows:

“ $303.30. Peekskill, Oct. 1, 1867.

At my death, if I die without heirs, I promise to pay to Enos Lee and Ebenezer Strang, as executors of the estate of Ebenezer Strang, deceased, $303.30, which is the amount of my share on the final distribution of the said estate, and of which I was to have the use during my life, and at my death to go…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wetmore v. . PorterNew York Court of Appeals · 1883

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Moss v. . CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  2. Atwood v. LesterSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1898
  3. Lawyers' Surety Co. v. ReinachAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1898
  4. Moss v. CohenNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1895
  5. Putnam v. Lincoln Safe Deposit Co.New York Supreme Court · 1906

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API