Hall v. Crawford & Delphenis

* Writ of error dismissed. The appellant relies upon the point in view, in effect, that as assignee he was entitled to restitution of the payments made to the appellees under the doctrine of resulting trusts, and that the court erred in holding otherwise, because the facts found by the court conclusively established misapplication of the corporation's funds by an officer thereof, and that the appellees acquired such, funds as transferees with notice. Every case of this character of misapplication must be decided in the light of its individual status and peculiar incidents. It appears that…