Legal Opinion

United States v. Brown

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided January 23, 1992No. NMCM 91 1927PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We have examined the record of trial, the assignment of error,1 2and the Government’s reply thereto, and have concluded that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to the substantial rights of the appellant was committed.

Pursuant to his pleas of guilty, the appellant was found guilty of one count of unauthorized absence, one count of larceny of jewelry valued at $2000.00, and one count of uttering a forged check in the amount of $150.00, in violation of Articles 86, 121 and *1025123, respectively, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ),…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. AllenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1984
  2. United States v. GreenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  3. United States v. BedaniaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  4. United States v. OlsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  5. United States v. KoopmanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. MartindaleU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API