Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Miller v. Hardwick

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided December 5, 1979No. CA 79-166Published

1ConcurrenceDavid Newbern, Judge

My concurrence in the result reached by the majority is reluctant. The majority opinion’s statement of the facts is correct except that it omits to say the motion for summary judgment was filed after the 30 days given the defendants to amend had elapsed, and no amendment had been filed. I can conceive of a rationale that no material issue of fact remained to be decided, as this failure to amend was a waiver of defenses. I decline to go that far. However, I do wish to point out where I disagree with the majority in areas I feel to be important.

First, the issue here is not whether the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McWater v. EboneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
  2. Cawood v. PierceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API