Splitdorf Electrical Co. v. King
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On certiorari to review’ an order of the Court of. Common Pleas of the county of Essex awarding compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation act.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Bergen, J.
The petition for compensation in this case was filed hv a daughter of a deceased workman on behalf of herself and her illegitimate child. The trial court properly decided that the daughter, because of her age, was not a dependent, but held that her illegitimate child was a grandchild within the statutory definition, and therefore entitled to com*422pensation, and judgment was thereupon entered according to such finding, to review which a writ oí. certiorari was allowed. The proofs in the case show that the daughter was not living with her father…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Scott v. Independent Ice Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1919
- Ohmen v. Adams BrothersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- Bassier v. J. Connelly Construction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1924
- Simpson v. State Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1934
- Carr v. Campbell Soup Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.